Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 281 - 300
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Panels of particular interest to our readers include:Plenary: State Building: Democratic and ManagerialChair: Alice O’Connor, UCSBMeg Jacobs, Princeton University, “Reconsidering Regulation in the New Deal andBeyond”K. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Even within the body of trade mark law proper, is the construct of the consumer different in registration proceedings as opposed to infringement contexts? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Robert Jacob: Doubts about so-called experts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
” In light of the Chief Justice Roberts's opinion in King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Writing for this blog, Mark Walsh provided a “view” of the day’s events from the Courtroom. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This Kat, however, thinks that AG Wathelet is right and that, when he says"[The applicant] must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services at issue",he is vindicating the point made by Sir Robin Jacob about "limping marks" back in the 1990s in Philips… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Ariane de Vogue of CNN, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Adam Lerner of Politico, Jacob Gershman of The Wall Street Journal, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press (via Yahoo! [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
Writing for Greenwire, Annie Snider and Jeremy Jacobs report on a new EPA rule on wetlands protection that was written with Justice Anthony Kennedy in mind. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
In what reads like an angry professor marking an incompetent, but arrogant, student's exam paper Justice Scalia (who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts) picks apart each of the Court's arguments. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted).Next, Westmont argues that the trial court erred in determining that Defendants' online review did not constitute defamation per se. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
The decision in Van Zuylen v Hag , in which the then European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the exercise of a trade mark right (as opposed to its mere existence as protected under the Treaty) where the mark had a common origin could unfairly partition the market, remains one of the most controversial decision in the Court’s history, and unfairly tipped the balance in favour of the internal market at the expense of the purpose… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ –… [read post]
