Search for: "James v. James"
Results 281 - 300
of 15,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 1:42 pm
KITTLESON, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0496, 2011 MT 88, TIM FELLOWS, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, JAMES DAY, BETH DORAN, et al., Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing
27 Jan 2021, 8:45 am
Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing Sophie Lawrance, Francion Brooks, James Batsford Journal of European Competition Law & Practice On 26 August 2020, the UK Supreme Court (the ‘Supreme Court’)... [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:55 pm
An important argument in the trial in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 (see summary here) was the evidentiary value of the minutes of a key board meeting. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:16 am
Dist. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
The Court of Appeal in R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:10 am
Property Easements This appeal arises out of a dispute between James Jessie, on the one hand, and John and Laura Gulso, on the other, regarding access easements James claims on the Gulsos' property. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 1:24 pm
EKLUND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:01 am
See Danjaq LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am
JAMES MUNGAS, DR. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
In a whopping great decision of 44 pages (noted here by the erudite Kat) the hearing officer upheld that opposition: in his view the registration of the mark would be detrimental to the distinctive character of Direct Line's phone mark, contrary to s 5(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.esure appealed, maintaining that the hearing officer - who was none other than the celebrated Allan James - had erred in his application of the relevant principles pertaining to the operation of s 5(3) of… [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
David Conrad of Fish & Richardson, PC; Kenneth Corsello of IBM; and James Pooley of James Pooley, PLC will discuss Compulife v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
James J. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
Edward Granger and James Goodwin recently published an article entitled, Where There’s a Will There’s a Way: Marley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
Baker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:04 am
James W. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight Appellant, David Mitchell, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Harford County of driving while impaired and failure to control vehicle speed as necessary to avoid a collision. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:05 am
Legal experts James Bopp, Jr. and Donald J. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
In today’s argument in Golan v. [read post]
