Search for: "James v. James" Results 281 - 300 of 15,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 7:14 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0496, 2011 MT 88, TIM FELLOWS, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, JAMES DAY, BETH DORAN, et al., Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing Sophie Lawrance, Francion Brooks, James Batsford Journal of European Competition Law & Practice On 26 August 2020, the UK Supreme Court (the ‘Supreme Court’)... [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:55 pm
An important argument in the trial in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 (see summary here) was the evidentiary value of the minutes of a key board meeting. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:10 am by rick.benedict
Property Easements This appeal arises out of a dispute between James Jessie, on the one hand, and John and Laura Gulso, on the other, regarding access easements James claims on the Gulsos' property. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
In a whopping great decision of 44 pages (noted here by the erudite Kat) the hearing officer upheld that opposition: in his view the registration of the mark would be detrimental to the distinctive character of Direct Line's phone mark, contrary to s 5(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.esure appealed, maintaining that the hearing officer - who was none other than the celebrated Allan James - had erred in his application of the relevant principles pertaining to the operation of s 5(3) of… [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
David Conrad of Fish & Richardson, PC; Kenneth Corsello of IBM; and James Pooley of James Pooley, PLC will discuss Compulife v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 8:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Edward Granger and James Goodwin recently published an article entitled, Where There’s a Will There’s a Way: Marley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight Appellant, David Mitchell, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Harford County of driving while impaired and failure to control vehicle speed as necessary to avoid a collision. [read post]