Search for: "January v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 21,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 9 In assessing economic dependence, both the DOL and the courts have historically applied a multi-factor totality of circumstances test, in which no one factor is dispositive. 10 The factors—which somewhat vary among the circuits—generally include the opportunity for profit and loss, investment, permanency, control, whether the work is an integral part of the hiring party’s business, and skill and initiative. 11 In January 2021, the DOL—for the first… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:48 am by steve cornforth blog
A consultation was published on 9th January 2024 and has just ended. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:24 am by Holly
The Corporate Transparency Act packs a punch Under the Corporate Transparency Act, which became effective on January 1, 2024, domestic and foreign companies registered to do business in the United States must submit beneficial ownership information reports to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"  Alito renewed that grievance just last month, writing gratuitously after agreeing with the Court's decision not to hear a case involving anti-LGBTQ+ bias that the appellate ruling at hand "exemplifies the danger that I anticipated in Obergefell v. [read post]