Search for: "John Barnett"
Results 281 - 300
of 795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
As tensions rise in Israel, Michael Barnett asked what the alternative to a two-state solution is. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm
Russia and Syria continue their coordinated air and ground operations against anti-Assad forces in the Idlib and Hama provinces in what one Syrian official referred to as a large offensive to reclaim western Syria from rebel factions. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
Randy Barnett takes this position in Restoring the Lost Constitution and it comes into especially sharp relief in John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport’s recent book Originalism and the Good Constitution. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
John Eastman, Lino Graglia) or are contrarians with more nuanced views who do not actually favor excluding most children of illegal immigrants from citizenship (e.g. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
”—George Rutherglen, John Barbee Minor Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
Our five guidelines are Bruising confirmation battles are worth the political capital for a lifetime appointment Paper trails are an asset, not a disqualification Reject clichéd calls for ‘judicial restraint’ Focus on the Constitution, not issues du jour Focus on clauses, not cases With respect to Guideline #1, I have been on record since 2005 with this Volokh post responding to the selection of John Roberts: Who is John Roberts? [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
Second, in a comment on Kurt’s post, Devin Watkins replies to Kurt’s confident assertion that John Bingham held Kurt’s reading of the Privileges or Immunities Clause with this 1871 report by Bingham for the House Judicial Committee on the meaning of the 14th and 15th Amendments: The clause of the fourteenth amendment, “no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,” does not, in the… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
Thanks so much, John, for that too-generous introduction. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
There is a piece by Adam Barnett on Byline entitled “Tory Press Flip-Flop on non-doms – here’s what they said in April”. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
I think I may have mentioned in the past, but Barry Barnett’s publication is one of my favorite recent additions to the LexBlog Network—he writes today the second part of a piece on the Apple e-book price fixing case. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
So, when I got to Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, it initially made some sense to me, and I could envision its appeal to many others. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
” Such a declaration “would, as John Hancock later put it, provide ‘the Ground & Foundation of a future Government. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
” Or, as the influential British political theorist John Locke wrote, “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Barnette,” St. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 3:30 pm
In an interview with Hugh Hewitt, Jeb Bush responded to criticism of his brother’s selection of John Roberts to be Chief Justice. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Health-care symposium contributors: Nicholas Bagley – University of Michigan Randy Barnett – Georgetown Michael Cannon – Cato David Rivkin – BakerHostetler Einer Elhauge – Harvard Tom Fisher – Indiana Abbe Gluck – Yale Brianne Gorod – Constitutional Accountability Center Timothy Jost – Washington and Lee Adam White – Boyden Gray & Associates Housing symposium contributors: Cory Andrews – Washington Legal… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:01 am
” The novel “The Clansman” by Thomas Dixon – a longtime political supporter, friend and former classmate of Wilson’s at Johns Hopkins University – was published in 1905. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
The first came during Reconstruction, when some members of Congress, especially John Bingham, sought to overturn Barron v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Or, in the words of John Marshall (with whom I sometimes do agree) in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
It is simply a pernicious myth that John Marshall invented the power of judges to nullify unconstitutional laws (which he never called a “power of judicial review”). [read post]
