Search for: "John Bell v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
It concluded that the first amended compliant satisfied the pleading standards required by the US Supreme Court’s rulings in Bell Atlantic Corp v Twombly, Ashcroft v Iqbal, and their progeny , and thus, should not have been dismissed. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court, holding that the protesters failed to state a claim under the Bell Atlantic and Iqbal decisions (rendered after they filed suit). [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be set forth by Lord & Taylor.) [read post]
Dec. 18, 2009)(per curiam) (Whistleblower case remanded in light of decision, holding in State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Emily Bell has a Guardian blog piece “Why the politicians must set their sights on Facebook. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
Skype blocks Fring, citing ‘misuse’ (ArsTechnica) Australia Holden wins the race in domain name dispute: GM Holden Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:04 am by Garrett Hinck
John Bellinger and Andy Wang argued that the Supreme Court should clarify the meaning of the touch and concern standards in Jesner v. [read post]