Search for: "Johnson v. Sessions" Results 281 - 300 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman excerpts some of the highlights from yesterday’s per curiam decision in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  Each session begins at 10 a.m. and each hearing is scheduled for one hour. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Its four sessions will address the following topics:Chase, The Antislavery Lawyer, covering his constitutional challenges to the  Fugitive Slave Act in the In re Matilda and Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:40 am by Dave Maass
In this panel, a group of attorneys will discuss the impact of several cases that EFF has been tracking closely, including Tarantino v Gawker, the battle over whether Sherlock Holmes is in the public domain, and an appellate court’s decision to force YouTube to remove “The Innocence of Muslims. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
As Jonathan notes, the Supreme Court unanimously decided NLRB v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
Under a proposed settlement agreement submitted to the court on Friday, April 11, Metlife, Inc. would pay $1.97 million to resolve class allegations that it unlawfully failed to pay California financial services representatives (FSR) their commissions, debited their accounts for company operating expenses, and neglected to pay overtime, and/or reimburse them for business expenses (Johnson v Metlife, Inc, CDCal). [read post]
Photo credit: Deborah Vagins, ACLU On March 15, 1965, President Lyndon Johnson addressed a televised special joint session of Congress. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week issued an odd and confusing opinion in a case styled Johnson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Ritika Singh
Meade tomorrow after today’s closed session. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:30 pm by Guest Blogger
  Although the parties dispute the precise nature and duration of the historical practice, it is undisputed that presidents made intra-session appointments as far back as Andrew Johnson, and that such appointments have been common for decades. [read post]