Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 281 - 300 of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 22708 (ED CA, Feb. 24, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a suit by a Hindu civil detainee that he was denied his religious vegan diet.In Perez v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:52 am by admin
You can read the full opinion in Midland Funding LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Nuclear Blast America * 512(f) Claim Fails in the 11th Circuit–Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
California) that an individual in Johnson’s situation certainly would not have felt he could walk away from the scene. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm by admin
  California state rules mandate judicial approval (and thus public disclosure) of the private settlement of a purported class action – even in its pre-certification infanc [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by Brad Pauley
”  To add just a hint of irony, it was Hiram Johnson who, as California’s governor in 1911, ushered in the state’s initiative process. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Authored by: Mary Johnson (212) 332-3525 mjohnson@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Authored by: Mary Johnson (212) 332-3525 mjohnson@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
States have largely enacted their FCA laws to mirror the federal FCA, which bars tax claims (e.g., California, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Virginia). [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Nuclear Blast America * 512(f) Claim Fails in the 11th Circuit–Johnson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune reported on the latest round of the Sugar v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]