Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
The Eighth Appellate District, however, applied a strict interpretation of Davis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:10 pm
Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment on seaman status and liability. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
District Court Judge Barbara S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Mylan Pharms. v. [read post]
Plaintiffs Denied Preliminary Injunction, But May Develop As-Applied Challenge To Legislative Prayer
30 Aug 2012, 4:15 am
In Jones v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Superior Court (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 1353, 1358, 1369–1370 or Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:44 am
In the case of Jones-Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:26 pm
Earlier today, Harrisburg-based Federal District Court Judge John E. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
Jones also credited the argument that Baker v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:04 am
The district court said “sure. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
The court describes the phenomenon: This case is one of many in the Northern District of Illinois’s “cottage industry” of “Schedule A” cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 8:51 am
in the Northern District of Mississippi -- not to be confused with USA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
While the DC Circuit found the use of the GPS in Jones was improper, the dissent argues that Jones is an “outlier”: the 5th, 7th, 8th, and 9th Circuits have come to a contrary conclusion, as did “the only Ohio case on point,” the 12th District’s decision last year in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:23 am
In Jones v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
The magistrate also discussed the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that is now before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
No. 2:12cr30-MEF, United States District Court, M.D. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:15 pm
In Hathaway v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
District Court for the Southern District of Alabama recently dismissed the EEOC’s claim that an employer’s policy prohibiting employees from wearing dreadlocks violated Title VII – the case of EEOC v. [read post]
