Search for: "Kelley v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
 Justice Kelley dissented and stated that she would have granted leave to appeal and ordered full briefing and oral argument because she considered this to be a jurisprudentially significant issue of first impression in Michigan. [read post]
23 May 2025, 6:30 am
Minton (Ohio State University), and Rohan Williamson (Georgetown University), on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 Tags: Climate, DADEs, ESG, GHG Board Leadership in an Era of Upheaval Posted by Rusty O’Kelley, Todd Safferstone, and PJ Neal, Russell Reynolds Associates, on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, Tariffs Evolution of AI Washing Enforcement: DOJ Enters the Picture Posted by Joel M. [read post]
23 May 2025, 6:30 am
Minton (Ohio State University), and Rohan Williamson (Georgetown University), on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 Tags: Climate, DADEs, ESG, GHG Board Leadership in an Era of Upheaval Posted by Rusty O’Kelley, Todd Safferstone, and PJ Neal, Russell Reynolds Associates, on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, Tariffs Evolution of AI Washing Enforcement: DOJ Enters the Picture Posted by Joel M. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At Burnham & Gorokov’s legal blog, law student Sarah Kelley discusses the oral argument in City of Hays v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Gardens: 7th Circuit Chapman Kelley v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]