Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am
The “common-sense purpose” of the Kelly rule requires that it be applied whenever a party is trying to introduce scientific techniques that, though “new, novel, or experimental, convey a misleading aura of certainty.” People v Stoll (1989) 49 C3d 1136, 1156. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Coming today to Fat Friday: PC-user David Hudgens discusses Macs in the law firm (specifically his), Michael Kelly compares his experience with an Acer Aspire laptop, an Asus EEE, and an Averatec, and Andrew Weltcheck compares BlueAnt Bluetooth headsets with the Nokia BH-200. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 7:04 am
Anglemyer v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
"A misapplication of the burden of proof is reversible error (see M.M. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 12:12 pm
Facts: This case (Susan Welch Kelly et al v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 7:42 am
That's the holding in a decision last week from the Court of Appeals.The case is Kelly v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Appellate Division rules disciplinary penalty imposed on employee excessiveMatter of Gomez v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 07181, Decided on October 2, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNew York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:15 am
Kay on the brief, successfully argued the denial of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion in Kelly v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Here is the abstract: In Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 10:43 am
Bank Kelly v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:25 am
Mark Kelly will become the firm's first chairman. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:53 pm
Today's Oregon Supreme Court opinion in Kelly v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:59 am
Kelly, 420 F.2d 26, 29 (2nd Cir. 1969). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:00 am
In State of Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:30 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kelly v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:48 pm
Kelly Eugene Tharp and Papa John's U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:48 am
Substantial evidence supports disciplinary hearing officer’s findings Mercado v Kelly, 54 AD3d 654 A police officer appealed his termination from his position as a New York City police officer after he was found guilty of certain charges following a disciplinary hearing. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:40 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MA v Merck Sharp & DOHME Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1426 (16 December 2008) Animatrix Ltd & Ors v O’Kelly [2008] EWCA Civ 1415 (16 December 2008) Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1427 (16 December 2008) Allan v Johnson Controls Automative (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1377 (16 December 2008) Smith [...] [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:58 am
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
