Search for: "Kennedy v. Austin"
Results 281 - 300
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Dassin, Jennifer Kennedy Park, and David E. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:42 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:53 am
That is the simple approach that Texas was seeking to have the Court embrace in Walker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
University of Texas at Austin (echoing the blockbuster Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
University of Texas at Austin.) [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm
Kennedy. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:26 pm
En cambio -y aquí también contradiciendo la retórica conservadora- es explícito en cambiar la doctrina limitativa de dos casos relativamente recientes -Austin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” (The Kennedy Center video of the event is available here.) [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[26] This is connected to the argument of the Court's majority in Austin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Kennedy’s seat on the Supreme Court, the White House announced. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
