Search for: "Kent v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
As Petitioners and the United States agree, Congress understood and incorporated that common-law meaning of "treated as the publisher" into Section 230(c)(1). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Also on Friday, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences briefly discussed the petition in Arizona v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Other commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
Kent County, as the “funding unit” of the 63rd District Court, acquired property in Grand Rapids Township to consolidate both divisions of the court in a new facility. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
United States, a recent Court of International Trade decision answering the burning question: Is a seat that you strap to a bicycle a seat or is it a bike accessory? [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:12 am
United States (08-876); Wood v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
Briefly: At ReligiousLiberty.TV, Michael Peabody notes that “[t]he Solicitor General … has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider [Patterson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
If the high court takes this case, an interesting question is posed: Can participating in a fantasy baseball league require Unites States Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves? [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
United States, under NAFTA's investment chapter, suggest that these issues extend to international investment and perhaps other areas. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:26 am
Municipality: Indigenous Land Recovery, Settler Resentment, and Taxation on the Oneida Reservation, NAIS: Native American and Indigenous Studies Kent McNeil, The Louisiana Purchase: Indian and American Sovereignty in the Missouri Watershed, Western Historical Quarterly Robert Miller, American Indian Sovereignty versus the United States, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies [read post]
