Search for: "Kevin V. Small"
Results 281 - 300
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
Like many others, I’m grateful for the excellent stream of tweets from Paul Anderson (@panderson) and others available here concerning the #Voltage hearing in Toronto on June 25, 2013 presided over by Prothonotary Kevin Aalto. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized their importance, describing links as an indispensable part of the Internet in the Crookes v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/2a93gv4 (Robert Unterberger) International eDiscovery, Sanctions, Ethics and US-UK Comparisons at Georgetown - http://tinyurl.com/25yj3gt (Chris Dale) Keyword Searches not Good Enough for eDiscovery, Experts Say - http://tinyurl.com/232mkh9 (Cindy Waxer) Lateral Moves, Court Rulings Spotlight E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/2ffcjwc (Gina Passarella) Legislators, Regulators Consider 'Do Not Track' Mechanism - http://tinyurl.com/2d28p3m (Lora Bentley) Moody v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:50 am
That's no small thing. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am
Then, when the Supreme Court effectively confirmed that CIA black sites were unlawful in 2006 by ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 pm
It was in response to the Supreme Court decision Kelo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
(b) The Minister may not designate an event as a protected event unless the staging of the event is in the public interest and the Minister is satisfied that the organisers have created sufficient opportunities for small businesses and in particular those of the previously disadvantaged communities. (2) For the period during which an event is protected, no person may use a trade mark in relation to such event in a manner which is calculated to achieve publicity for that trade mark and… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
(b) The Minister may not designate an event as a protected event unless the staging of the event is in the public interest and the Minister is satisfied that the organisers have created sufficient opportunities for small businesses and in particular those of the previously disadvantaged communities.(2) For the period during which an event is protected, no person may use a trade mark in relation to such event in a manner which is calculated to achieve publicity for that trade mark and… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm
(b) The Minister may not designate an event as a protected event unless the staging of the event is in the public interest and the Minister is satisfied that the organisers have created sufficient opportunities for small businesses and in particular those of the previously disadvantaged communities. (2) For the period during which an event is protected, no person may use a trade mark in relation to such event in a manner which is calculated to achieve publicity for that trade mark and… [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Below the Courts of Common Pleas are the municipal courts (sometimes called “small claims court”) which hear civil matters below a certain monetary threshold (usually $10,000 or lower) and some summary criminal offenses. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
KomosinskiErin O’Leary, Esq.Elder Kevin E. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
And while residence restrictions are aimed at keeping strangers away from children, strangers commit a small percentage of child-sex offenses. [read post]
