Search for: "Kong v. Justice" Results 281 - 300 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Although not overtly confrontational, the prevailing public opinion reflects a nuanced support for movements seeking self-determination and justice. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a revised opinion in Doe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Ebrahimi, An Overview of the Private International Law of Iran: Theory and Practice (Part Two)   Nikolay Natov / Boriana Musseva / Teodora Tsenova / Dafina Sarbinova / Zahari Yanakiev / Vasil Pandov, Application of the EU Private International Law Instruments in Bulgaria William Easun / Géraldine Gazo, Trusts and the Principality of Monaco  Court Decisions Michael Bogdan, Defamation on the Internet, forum delicti and the E-Commerce Directive: Some Comments on the ECJ… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/xiTSIPjKRr 2017-12-10 No Injunction for service to continue beyond termination https://t.co/cb65mvLVym v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
This will be held on 17 and 18 February 2020, from 9am-6pm on both days, in the Hong Kong Alumni Room, UCL Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) Goverment should shuffle ministries and ministers (Michael Geist) On poetic justice and subsidies (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) Post-election C-61 coverage (Michael Geist) 'Running Rings Around Trade-marks The Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act: Issues for Artists' workshop to open dialogue between artists and VANOC (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China How do the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong relate to each other regarding IPRs… [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
The claimant argued that “the judgment of Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV v Bank of China Ltd, [2015] EWHC 999 (Comm) of the English High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division Commercial Court (hereinafter “Spliethoff Case”) could be regarded as positive precedent of Chinese judgments recognised and enforced by English Courts. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Hong Kong Development Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po and his wife Frieda Hui Po-ming face a HK$7 million (US$903,220) legal bill after a defamation case against them. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong The BBC had a piece “How Hong Kong protesters avoid police surveillance”. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]