Search for: "LB v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:24 am
Goremsandu -v- LB of Harrow This was looked at in the recent case of Goremsandu -v- London Borough of Harrow. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:43 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:19 am
" Wamboldt v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
That defence was struck out in the County Court on the basis of Qazi v LB Harrow [2004] 1 AC 983, and subsequent appeals to the Court of Appeal and (a seven person) House of Lords were unsuccessful. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:25 am
This is not, after all, a case like Church of Scientology International v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm
The import site, in some cases, may be the organization's headquarters in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 am
Click here for earlier LB coverage on the case, Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:20 pm
Here's the case: United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:28 am
Today, state and federal regulations severely limit the use of asbestos in the United States, and oversee its safe handling and proper disposal. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am
Click here for earlier LB posts. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
The guidance is, mostly, explaining and endorsing the effect of R (G) v LB Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 (see our note here). [read post]
