Search for: "LIVINGSTON v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So this is really a sanctions case and not a defamation case.The case is Goldman v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit also orders injunctive relief in favor of the abortion providers.The case is People of the State of New York v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" This case asks when the police may conduct multiple inventory searches.The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit revives a case filed by a Jewish organization in Connecticut that wanted to expand its building.The case is Chabad Lubavich v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But state courts over the years have reached different holdings on this issue. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Yet another Second Circuit ruling reminds us how difficult is is to show that you suffered discrimination because other guys at work who also broke the rules were not punished.The case is Diggs v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you do, this case answers a question that few of us had even asked before.The case is Hines v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit quotes from a recent Supreme Court ruling stating that the Constitution cannot be "cut . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Another trainer embarrassed plaintiff by repeatedly and loudly stating that plaintiff had failed an exercise. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm by Maria Hook
This result is patently unfair, and courts have found a way to avoid it by concluding that, in order to be deductible, the debt must be one that is likely to be paid or recovered (see, eg, Livingstone v Livingstone (1980) 4 MPC 129 (NZHC)). [read post]