Search for: "Lang v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 8:56 am
The decision directs us to Lewison J’s comment in Ivax Pharmaceuticals v Akzo Nobel NV [2006] which states that “obstacles to regulatory approval….are not relevant obstacles to an obviousness attack”. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:35 am
Massachusetts’ judges will not determine a parent’s post-high school child support when a child is years away from college because of the court’s decision in Lang v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:15 am
Case date: 05 December 2019 Case number: No. 18-1363 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court, which failed this year to decide a case that could have a major impact in eastern Oklahoma, has chosen a different path to determine whether tribal reservations in the state were officially terminated,” agreeing on Friday to review McGirt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:47 am
In this case entitled Meg Yatauro v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:43 am
For instance, in Imar v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:15 pm
Kapoor v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:05 pm
Chong v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:44 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:06 am
Filing and examination fee discounts extended to joint applicants A 30% reduction for the filing and examination fees is available for entitled applicants such as SMEs, natural persons and universities from an EPC contracting state having an official language different from one of the official languages of the EPO. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
”United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am
Finally, the Board did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider an untimely argument made by the petitioner (Henny Penny Corporation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm
The second referral, Sandoz v. [read post]
