Search for: "Large v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 2,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Billington, another such case in Los Angeles Superior Court, but the court there dismissed the claim on substantive grounds and didn't reach the pseudonymity question; and the defendant in any event identified the plaintiff in court filings—the plaintiff hadn't gotten leave to proceed pseudonymously, and there was certainly no court order limiting how the defendant could refer to the plaintiff—so the matter became largely… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
As Constance Backhouse recounts, when Madam Justice L’Heureux-Dubé was appointed to the Superior Court of Quebec in 1973, she objected to being addressed as Monsieur le juge, the term most often blurted out by the lawyers who appeared in her courtroom. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
  While federal court judges addressing the validity of the household exclusion thereafter largely followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s mandate, some state court appellate and trial judges limited the Gallagher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
However, in other contexts, such as heavy industrial projects and the energy sector, where repair and maintenance work might involve the comprehensive replacement of very large and very expensive parts of machinery and equipment, or massive investment in capital repairs, the differences between maintenance, repair and construction are often less clear, and courts frequently struggle with where to draw the line. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
The passage makes for a curious mix of transatlantic policy objectives in the areas of steel sector decarbonization, carbon border adjustments, trade defence instruments, and inbound investment screening: Compatible with international obligations and the multilateral rules, including potential rules to be jointly developed in the coming years, each participant in the arrangements would undertake the following actions: (i) restrict market access for non-participants that do not meet conditions of… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Pfizer Case The Delaware Superior Court’s decision in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the plaintiff's or defendant's past cases have been pseudonymous, that information may be largely unavailable (at least until you ask for information about the party's past cases in discovery, and the party accurately answers). [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:05 am by Tim Reed, FordHarrison
As discussed by the California Supreme Court in its 1995 opinion in Farmers Insurance Group v. [read post]
While the court agreed with the FTC that it could have pursued monetary relief under an alternative statute, it found that the FTC had waived the right to request such relief in this case, largely because in the FTC’s Rule 26 disclosures, the FTC had only calculated damages under 13(b). [read post]