Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 281 - 300
of 7,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Will EPA and the states be required to address greenhouse gas emissions in federal Title V permits? [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:17 am
Roberts, et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:09 am
Davis v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:19 am
COMES v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:19 am
The Texas Workforce Commission Shared Work Program is one example of a solution that allows an employer to reduce an employee’s hours, as opposed to laying off its employees, while permitting affected employees to collect a portion of unemployment benefits. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 7:58 am
In Tracy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 10:40 pm
In Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
After a quiet century or so, the scope of Congress’s power “[t]o lay and collect taxes” is once again in the news. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
In Hendricks v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 7:57 pm
Although California can lay claim to the most infamous three-strike law, New York has one as well--a law that was successfully challenged under Blakely last week in Portalatin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:06 am
(Eugene Volokh) From the Norwood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:40 am
In People v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 pm
Relying on the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation, the First Circuit rejected the presumption suggested by the concurrence in Klier v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Elle a toutefois adopté une approche différente en ce qui concerne les délibérés en cour d’instance, qui peuvent constituer des événements distincts et être déduits du délai à ce titre. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:59 am
At trial, D testifies that he did not lay a hand on V. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 5:59 am
At trial, D testifies that he did not lay a hand on V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:15 pm
It has become difficult to understand why the Federal Circuit does what it does in any number of rulings, but its decisions relating to patent eligibility have set patent law back several generations, turned precedent on its head, ignored the Patent Act passed by Congress, and unnecessarily and inexplicably expanded upon bad Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
