Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 281 - 300 of 4,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2014, 5:56 pm
Thirty years later, however, on June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Miller v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:28 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court concluded:in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the In-Person Requirements cause an undue burden in violation of the Constitution, imposing a substantial obstacle on a large fraction of the relevant women seeking a medication abortion.AP reports on the decision.In Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Last week’s online symposium reflected various perspectives on how the Supreme Court is likely to rule on Arizona’s S.B. 1070 in light of its recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Finally, $175/hour was an appropriate rate for a 2021 law school graduate who, at the time that the Motion was filed, had not yet taken the New York State Bar. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Andrew Hamm
Memphis Light, Gas & Water 19-1388Issue: Whether Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  He unsuccessfully moved for resentencing in light of Miller v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am by Florian Mueller
There were very strong indications that one Samsung SEP was found valid and infringed by Apple, and the ITC now has to think about remedies in light of FRAND. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am by Julia E. Browning and Stephen Marietta
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The webinar focused on a changed national landscape of “bet the company” employment disputes fueled by an aggressive plaintiffs’ bar and invigorated federal and state enforcement regimes. [read post]