Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 11,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:22 pm
Brennan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
United States, was filed after a defendant was indicted and convicted in a federal drug distribution case on three counts. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
V. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
United States: How can such a small case be such a big game-changer? [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Lane in 2004 and United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:28 pm
The Fourth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
United States, is pretty simple. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:20 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
