Search for: "Lite v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
United States, 213 F.3d 1366, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
Celebrating the 'Kelo' House
Legal Times
Three years ago next week, the Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions so far this century: Kelo v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:21 am
In the McIntosh v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:03 pm
The opinion is Alabama State Bar v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
Kirby v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
Therefore, the need to adapt the products in question to the rules in force in the member State in which they are marketed prevents the German requirements from being treated as selling arrangements (see Canal Satélite Digital, paragraph 30). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
This need for government intervention to make the system work effectively ought to be a caution to those in favor of regulation lite in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
" (Meligan's characteristic yellow hi-lite left in for emphasis) The reality is... [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
joint v. sole? [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:04 pm
It was in the case of Wilkerson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Clark v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
District Court in Manhattan, to serve as Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
In our prior posts on "Preemption Lite" and "Then There Were Seven," we discussed the impact of certain "safe harbor" provisions under state consumer fraud acts where the violations being claimed involved FDA-regulated activities.We're pleased to report that one of those cases, Pennsylvania Employee Benefit Trust Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
You can now state openly what you though all along - that it's safe and effective to cure Alzheimers. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:58 pm
Decades after the United States Supreme Court issued its 1954 desegregation mandate in Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
joint v. sole? [read post]
