Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 281 - 300
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In one case, FDA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
More recently in the long-awaited appeal in Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 5 (see IPKat overview here) the argument focused on whether Chobani could use the term ‘Greek yoghurt' to describe their yoghurt. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
Not so fast…“It is a challenge to ever know what a judgment really means, especially one as long as Mr Justice Birss' latest decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
National Lead Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Arnold J of the UK Patents Court to conclude in [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat) that one part of the two-pronged test established by the CJEU in Teva v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Arnold, No. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
That said, I was somewhat surprised at the weakness of some (not all) of their arguments – ‘the agreement can’t mean X because that would not be a good agreement for us’ was surely never going to be a flyer in the face of Arnold v Britton [2015] AC 1619, for instance. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Darren tells all.* BREAKING NEWS Full decision out in the Lyrica case, and it's a whopperDarren breaks the news of the issuance of Mr Justice Arnold's first instance judgement following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert (case management decision here, Court of Appeal decision here and here, and four first instance decisions here, here, here and here).* The debate… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
The UK arm of the same dispute has led Arnold J to refer a question to the ECJ ("What are the criteria for deciding whether 'the product is protected by a basic patent in force' in Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation? [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:06 pm
On 27 November, the ECJ's long-awaited decision in Intel v CPM is due out. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
In House v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
” – the court has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of “outstanding benefit” in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Pluripotent v totipotent So what does this distinction amount to? [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Watkins v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
This augurs a long-term threat to the acceptance of IP as well, observes Neil.* Flood's patent threats action runs dryPatent actions are highly unusual territory where to see successful summary judgment applications, writes Katfriend Paul England while commenting the IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others [2015] EWHC 153 (IPEC). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Upcoming proceedings In Arnold v Fairfax & Shadbolt, a two-week jury trial has been set down for 26 February 2018, with Mallon J presiding. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
In my judgment Mr Arnold fell into error in characterising the registration of marks in a series in the way that he did. [read post]
