Search for: "Long v. Brooks"
Results 281 - 300
of 833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Political scientists have long debated the degree to which government officials respond to majority preferences. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
As always comments and reactions most welcome for what is a long term work in progress. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:43 am
These allegations state a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:46 am
For more information, please choose to follow the case further at International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for speedily compiling the relists, even if I couldn’t slap this update together as speedily. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:40 am
In both Brooks and Michael, the point was made with force by the court that whether a situation is characterized as a positive act or omissions can merely depend on how it is described and that the distinction is not meritorious. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am
It has been stressed that the question of whether the harm from a third party resulted from a positive act or from an omission by the police should not justify a different outcome and that the distinction was unmeritorious: Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495 at [32] and repeated in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] 1 AC 1732 at [51]. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:09 am
In Jacobus v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 6:39 am
SUNY Stony Brook, decided on January 29. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Judge Sporkin’s decree: Rather than merely going after every bad actor, ensure good behavior by pursuing those who control “access” to our capital markets, which will accomplish far more in the long run. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
“The basic dimension of the Chinese context—that our country is still and will long [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for compiling the cases in this post. [read post]
