Search for: "Long v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 281 - 300 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm by appealattorneylaw
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, No. 10-15306, the Court affirmed another denial of a 2254 petition for habeas. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher Congressional action to correct the Supreme Court’s decision in Carcieri v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The old regs said that for a minor, readily corrected misrepresentation, the Department would inform the institution and try to get an informal, voluntary correction, but for a substantial misrepresentation the Department would initiate a formal action. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
He is not able to make long, sustained notes. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Prior to his current position, he states he was a Vice President in the Portfolio Retention Department at Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and prior to that he says he was Vice President of Loan Services at World Savings Bank, FSB. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court cited the case of Nixon v US, which involved impeachment but not of president Nixon. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
In the case of Gram Panchayat & Anr. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:45 am by Legal Beagle
THE Law Society of Scotland has finally produced a report on complaints regarding the actions of its former Legal Aid Negotiating Team Committee members who sped off to form their own private firm in what many solicitors said was an organised attempt to grab legal aid money. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Companies will be able to get away with retaliation as long as it is a contractor retaliating against its own employees. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am by 1 Crown Office Row
That case concerned proceedings before SIAC to determine whether the Secretary of State’s suspicions that an individual was involved in terrorism were correct. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Bad David Cole is surely correct that Subtitle D (“Counterterrorism”) of the NDAA contains some very troubling provisions—especially sections 1026 and 1027, which continue the deeply unfortunate and counterproductive authorities in current law prohibiting the use of funds to build a facility in the U.S. to house GTMO detainees and to transfer any such detainees to the U.S. for any reason, including criminal trial; and section 1028, which continues… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
The Bad David Cole is surely correct that Subtitle D (“Counterterrorism”) of the NDAA contains some very troubling provisions—especially sections 1026 and 1027, which continue the deeply unfortunate and counterproductive authorities in current law prohibiting the use of funds to build a facility in the U.S. to house GTMO detainees and to transfer any such detainees to the U.S. for any reason, including criminal trial; and section 1028, which continues the current statutory… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker  from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful,  and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
The exemption of home health care workers from labor rights laws was the subject of Evelyn Coke’s bitterly contested Supreme Court case, Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
LANE, Appellees. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Foreign corporations -- Service of process on defendant corporation quashed -- Plaintiff attempted to perform substitute service pursuant to incorrect Florida long arm jurisdiction statute -- Further, plaintiff did not strictly comply with requirements for substituted service against domestic corporation, which requires notification by registered or certified mail to defendant after service upon Secretary of… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 Here what GAO Wants:Recommendation 1: To better ensure the safety of oysters from the Gulf of Mexico that are sold for raw consumption, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) should direct the Commissioner of FDA to work with the ISSC to agree on a nationwide goal for reducing the number of V. vulnificus illnesses caused by the consumption of Gulf Coast raw oysters and develop strategies to achieve that goal, recognizing that consumer education and time and… [read post]