Search for: "Long v. Willis"
Results 281 - 300
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
v=4TPuttz2wes Is lifetime sinecure a bad thing? [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Strack, 652 A.2d 965, Willis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am
There is the Cracknell v Willis defence of challenging the breath machine (not much help in a urine sample case though) and myriad technical issues.I have seen offers of courses in motoring law for solicitors that make the point that this is one of the decreasing number of areas where the private individual is prepared to shell out hefty fees to try to stay on the road. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and through March 23, 2009, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Grant Thornton LLP concluded… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:06 am
and bundled them up willy-nilly for the poor judges. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:02 am
DIVORCE LAW INDIANA published a post, Hiring a divorce lawyer: Rambo v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
Effective notice goes a long way to quiet objectors. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:58 am
The case is Turner v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:08 am
In Francis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
Business must learn the lesson, long ago learned by labor and other self-interest groups. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:46 pm
Democrats responded with talk of the "long, grueling confirmation process" [um, 10 weeks?] [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 3:20 pm
And he noted in a Court of Appeal decision out of the Ontario Courts one case, Chang v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
" In the immortal words of Gary Coleman: Who you talkin' about, Willis?! [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
Per Curiam Opinion.Supremes revisit sovereign immunity issues in several decisions issued May 1, 2009; hand down long-awaited decision on constitutionality of appellate procedure in parental rights termination cases.MORE TOXIC JURISPRUDENCE: POISON GAS CLAIM INACTIONABLE AS PUBLIC NUISANCE, TAKINGS CLAIMCity of San Antonio v. [read post]
