Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 281 - 300
of 15,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit holds -- fairly predictably -- that the California Supreme Court did just fine when it held that individual PAGA claims may be required to go to arbitration but the non-individual PAGA claims can stay in court. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:08 am
Case citation: Philpot v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Russia and South Africa v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
Although Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
That is the 1920 case called Eisner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:37 pm
Under SORA, sex offenders are classified into three risk levels: Level 1 (low risk), Level 2 (moderate risk), and Level 3 (high risk). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
John's University student who claims he was falsely accused of sexual misconduct cannot sue the university for sex discrimination under Title IX because the complaint does not plausibly assert that the university ruled against him because he is a male.The case is Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:03 pm
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Brian Cathcart argues this signals the Labour Party’s renewed support for Leveson-style press regulation, albeit it in a low-key fashion. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]