Search for: "M/V Satisfaction"
Results 281 - 300
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2017, 1:17 pm
Case-by-case Waivers A waiver may be granted only if a foreign national demonstrates to the consular officer’s or CBP official’s satisfaction that: denying entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship; entry would not pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States; and entry would be in the national interest. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:00 am
Seymore is Professor of Law at Texas A&M University School of Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
Joseph M. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:57 pm
Last September, Judge Rakoff made a major ruling in the Madoff case (Picard v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:21 am
Mudge and Randall M. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
From Parker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 10:47 pm
[State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:02 pm
But along comes Judge Markell, writing for the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 6:24 am
Fact questions existed as to whether cleaning patient discharge rooms in 30 to 45 minutes was an essential function of the ESA position or whether the cleaning standards unlawfully screened out disabled persons (Dupont v Allina Health System, January 28, 2014, Davis, M). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
I’m not sure what else I can do.Peter Padilla: I SAID GOOD DAY! [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:19 am
On December 6, 1999, a consortium of 18 different record labels filed their lawsuit against Napster in a case that is goes by the name A&M Music v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
But, in the context of Section 5 UMC claims, I’m not sure how much comfort this really affords. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:08 am
I’m into material portions of the contact. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
I’m not defending all of Anonymous actions. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
Nickolai V. [read post]
