Search for: "MARK AGRAVES"
Results 281 - 300
of 734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 12:36 am
à la Pirate Bay [Katposts here]. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:50 am
Even if the Copyrighted Material is a functional work, or merger or scènes à faire applied, it is still entitled to thin protection. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
This vision of masculinity may summon up an image of a closemouthed cowboy, à la John Wayne. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
Déjà Vu? [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
2019 marks the fourth year of an important change, in which many of the most important branches of the faith came together to produce a unified letter. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am
Also arrested were James Scott, then Sunday People editor and formerly Sunday Mirror deputy editor and news editor (mentioned 46 times in the unredacted Gulati judgement); Nick Buckley, then deputy People editor and formerly Sunday Mirror head of news (30 mentions); and Mark Thomas, a former editor of the People and a former deputy editor of the Sunday Mirror (19 mentions). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:13 pm
Plus, the 2034 group already hired one of the best in the sovereign litigation business, Mark Stancil (remember Argentina and pari passu). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:26 am
Vis-à-vis the “BRENT” mark, it was found that the mark would designate a characteristic of financial services that related to, or was connected with, Brent oil. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Décision L’absence d’avis conforme aux articles 76 et 77 du Code de procédure civile est un obstacle dirimant à la déclaration d’inconstitutionnalité d’une loi. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 2:48 am
" Each application provided a statement that the characters in the mark "transliterate to 'Haima rìben liàoli," which means "seahorse Japanese cuisine" in English. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
Can it attract a trade mark monopoly? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
A trade mark that has greater technical distinctiveness enjoys a high threshold before a competing sign will be considered dissimilar to it (i.e. more differentiating factors would have to be present); conversely, a trade mark that has a lower technical distinctiveness would have a lower threshold before a competing sign will be considered dissimilar to it.The High Court was also not persuaded that Monster Energy should have protection vis-à-vis the family of trade… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 12:08 pm
"Library and Archives Canada Launches New National Union Catalogue (February 4, 2018): "The launch of Voilà, a milestone for LAC in its library renewal project, marks the completion of the migration of the national union catalogue holdings from AMICUS to OCLC (...) [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 5:30 pm
As Professor Larry Catà Backer observed in his rich and complex presentation, in China there is a shared consensus about the need for the composite constitution to order politics and the state, Party members and civil servants. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
(…) It is confusing and inaccurate to refer to two separate marks—a registered mark and a common-law mark. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Par ailleurs, le juge était en présence d’un cas donnant ouverture à l’exception traditionnelle à l’irrecevabilité du ouï-dire à l’égard des coconspirateurs. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
The recent history of judicial review in Canada has been marked by ebbs and flows of deference, confounding tests and new words for old problems, but no solutions that provide real guidance for litigants, counsel, administrative decision makers or judicial review judges. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 2:25 pm
” Stone Lion, 746 F.3d at 1323 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
Ces treize conditions n’ont nullement besoin d’être réalisées pour aboutir à la reconnaissance d’une confusion contraire au droit des marques : seuls les facteurs relevant dans chaque espèce sont à considérer.L’existence d’une confusion effective n’est pas nécessaire pour reconnaître un risque de confusion illicite. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
.), Montréal, 500-09-027033-174Décision de : Juges Mark Schrager, Robert M. [read post]
