Search for: "MARK D. MITCHELL"
Results 281 - 300
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Rubin, Missing the (Certification) Mark: How The Lanham Act Unnecessarily Restricts State and Local Governments as Certifiers, 71 Stan. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• William D. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:37 am
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
§ 1182(n)(2)(D). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:22 am
Devlin Barrett and Carol D. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm
Mitchell (1993). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:47 am
Or how about that other Florida (albeit disbarred) attorney Mitchell Gross noted by Nancy Rapoport’s Blogspot: “Story of (former) lawyer’s chutzpah“? [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Mark Zuckerberg has said Facebook will review its content policies after facing widespread backlash, including from its own employees, over the decision to leave up controversial posts from Donald Trump. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:51 pm
“He’d say, ‘Let’s have martinis,’ and I’d have a martini, as would he,” Koch said. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:41 am
Mark Morales reports for CNN. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
She praised the current commission for working minimise harm and hurt suffered by complainants and providing quick and free access to redress, and advocated a kite mark system as a “marker of trust” for online publishers. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, Petitioners,v.YOLANDA LOPEZ, SHERYL HAMER, ELMER DEGUZMAN AND RICHARD WECKER, Respondents.No. 17-0733.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued March 12, 2019.Opinion delivered: May 17, 2019. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 1:13 am
Click the image to view the article SEN. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 7:49 pm
Mark Meadows (R-NC), Rep. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 10:19 pm
Nancy Grace, Jane Valez-Mitchell, Mark Lunsford, John Walsh, etc, are NOT experts. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The court identified three errors, (i) defendant’s prior record level being identified as V instead of IV, (ii) the marking of box 12 of the sentencing sheet for committing an offense while on pretrial release, and (iii) not marking the box on the aggravating factors sheet noting that defendant entered a plea to the aggravating factor. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
