Search for: "MARK GRAY v. THE STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
On 2 March 2011, the Court of Appeal dismissed the application for permission to appeal in the case of Kaschke v Gray. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Hy-Grade Valve Inc (Gray on Claims) (Maier & Maier) (Docket Report) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Court’s ‘Greater familiarity with the law of false marking due to the hundreds of cases filed’ does not weigh against transfer of venue: Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by Matt Osenga
Thanks to Gray on Claims for keeping track of the large number of false marking cases being filed and decided. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Bridgeport Fittings (Gray on Claims) CAFC: The teeth of KSR: Obviousness on summary judgment: Tokai Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:35 am by Matt Osenga
Gray on Claims and the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen have sites devoted to false marking cases. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
British American Tobacco defeats trade mark challenge in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Philip Morris Products S.A. v British American Tobacco (Brands) Limited (jiplp) Brazil Can we feed the hungry on statistics? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am by Justin E. Gray
Recently, a defendant in a false marking case pending before the Western District of Pennsylvania (FLFMC v. [read post]