Search for: "MARSHALL v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 4,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
In Gentile v State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030, 1072-1074 (1991), the Supreme Court recognized that “The speech of lawyers representing clients in pending cases may be regulated under a less demanding standard than that established for regulation of the press in Nebraska Press Assn. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
Marshall Cohen, Sara Murray and Annie Grayer report for CNN. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am by Ben Allums and David L. Reisman
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:13 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: The case will determine whether state-owned foreign corporations can be criminally prosecuted in the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am by Mark Walsh
  The last opinion announced from the bench was in Kansas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Hyemin Han shared the Supreme Court Marshal’s report on the 2022 leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS The Supreme Court announced yesterday that an internal investigation had failed to identify who leaked a draft of the opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Yesterday, the Supreme Court released the Marshal's Report of Investigation concerning the leak of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Office of the Marshal Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D.C. 20543. [read post]