Search for: "MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 281 - 300
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
George Logan, a state legislator who traveled to France in 1798 to try to negotiate an end to the France-America Quasi-War. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
In BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:42 pm
Question Presented: Whether actions to cancel or revoke a patent must be tried in Article III Courts with access to a jury under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
United States (1879). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
He remained close to the other Harlans, one of whom was Justice John Marshall Harlan — the “great dissenter” of the Supreme Court — who argued on behalf of equal rights under the law in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Paul Marshall, Bridge Securities, LLC a/k/a/ Bridge Financial, Bridge Equity, Inc., and FOGfuels, Inc.Case number: 13-cv-3032 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case filed: September 11, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 16, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-102 SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
After all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underling [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am
Marshall Erwin in Real Clear Defense examines how legal scholars arguing over U.S. surveillance and intelligence policy has actually “hurt America’s national security bottom line. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Brennan, Thurgood Marshall and Potter Stewart. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
The marshal challenged his removal on the grounds that it violated 5 U.S.C. [read post]
