Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm
Peter J. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:13 pm
Under G.S. 15A-101(4a), in criminal matters, “[j]udgment is entered when sentence is pronounced. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:13 pm
Under G.S. 15A-101(4a), in criminal matters, “[j]udgment is entered when sentence is pronounced. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 6:28 pm
District Judge Herman J. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
Eady J at first instance in Tamiz thought these might be relevant. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The ED was of the opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 contained surgical steps and as such was excluded from patentability.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Method for determining the change or change in length of a first object (b) which is connected in an initial state to a second object (d) via a joint (k) and which has been changed after having been detached from the second object (d), wherein a reference system (e1) is attached… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
When the demand did not prompt a response, defendant on April 22, 2008 moved to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
View the article hereCopyright 1998 by Ronald B. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
§157(b)(2)(C)[1] (as the bankruptcy court had determined in issuing its final judgment). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
P-2009-2542.Ethan J. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
James J. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
J., and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor joined. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 3:39 am
Rev. 1489John C. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
In their dissent, Brown and Rowe JJ. applied a narrower interpretation, as did Côté J. in her separate dissent. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:30 pm
J, Tit. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
Judge Griffin wrapped up his opinion on a premonitory note: how the Court interprets the statute, he warned, would “continue to matter for years to come,” including for drug offenses sentenced under section 401(c) of the Act, which uses language identical to the language used in section 403(b). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
[Lots of notices b/c lots of internet!] [read post]
