Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 281 - 300 of 3,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The linchpin of Mostyn J’s conclusions in his recent series of judgments is (a) that the correct interpretation of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 is that financial remedy proceedings which are not concerned with child maintenance are and should always have been heard in public or as if in public, and (b) that, even if this is not right, the 2009 rule change which admitted accredited journalists to hearings of financial remedy proceedings rendered them public hearings. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm by Matthias Weller
 74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  One may wonder whether Hamilton was sincere, but it really doesn’t matter. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
That would be especially true if a state law treats reasonable use of geolocation technology as an adequate defense when geography matters—for instance, when reasonable even if imperfect geoblocking attempts are seen as evidence of lack of intent to target a particular state for personal jurisdiction purposes,[24] or when reasonable geolocation attempts are seen as sufficient for determining that a defendant's copyright infringement happened within the court's… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
A few states, for instance—including New York, where Fox is headquartered—require a showing of "actual malice" for all statements of public concern, including statements about private figures.[2] Most other states allow recovery of proven compensatory damages for libel based on a showing of mere negligence.[3] Presumably Fox would want to avoid even negligent mistakes, just as a matter of editorial policy. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Jan von Hein
Does the term “contract for the provision of services” in Art 4(1)(b) Rome I Regulation include a building cont [read post]