Search for: "MATTER OF G P"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
John G. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:59 am
Accordingly, the court found that it was competent to resolve the matter without waiting for the FDA to weigh in. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:02 pm
McDonald & Elaine G. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
By popular demand, this comprehensive “Non-GAAP Financial Measures Handbook” covers a challenging topic, from the basics to everything you want to know about Regulation G, Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K & Form 8-K’s Item 2.02. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:28 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:00 am
Thanks to Peter G. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
By popular demand, this comprehensive “Non-GAAP Financial Measures Handbook” covers a challenging topic, from the basics to everything you want to know about Regulation G, Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K & Form 8-K’s Item 2.02. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:38 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:03 pm
Professor G. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 6:58 am
Finnerty, III, Esq., Partner DLA Piper LLP Kevin P. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
was quickly followed by the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Matter of Frank G. v Renee P. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
was quickly followed by the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Matter of Frank G. v Renee P. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
The methods differ essentially in that in the method according to claim 1, (i) the linear matrix equation ‘p = G x w’ used in document D6 to represent the linear effect of the concentration estimates – where p is a column vector which describes the peak quantitation data of a DNA sample from the signal, G is a matrix that represents the genotypes in the DNA sample and w is a weight column vector that represents relative proportions of template… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:19 pm
Based on those findings, the district court remanded the matter to Reliance for reconsideration, ordering it to make a new benefits determination, after which it finally granted the benefits due. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:32 am
Martin of Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, DC; Scott P. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:40 am
Breuer of the Criminal Division and John G. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:10 am
Before someone gets hung up on making sure that they are obtaining a suitably “strategic” patent, a good thing to remember is that patents rarely matter, but when they matter, they matter a lot. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:10 am
Before someone gets hung up on making sure that they are obtaining a suitably “strategic” patent, a good thing to remember is that patents rarely matter, but when they matter, they matter a lot. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
P. 26(g) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 16. 2. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
” She thus concludes that “[p]laintiff has an interest in and need for at least a portion of it. [read post]
