Search for: "MATTER OF J W K" Results 281 - 300 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
“[W]e do not believe that a trial court in the context of a products liability action is the proper forum. . . . [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Shigley
People caught in a cycle of addiction, crime and unemployment are as a practical matter unavailable for productive employment and responsible parenting of children they help bring into the world. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:55 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0227, 2011 MT 311, IN THE MATTER OF: J.W.C., L.W.C., K.W.C. and C.W.C., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm by Lovechilde
 Yet change that actually matters occurs only rarely. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Recently published sports law scholarship includes:Jessica L. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Lawyer and psychologist Delee Fromm recommends looking at humorous comics or reading something that always makes you laugh if you are feeling negative before a negotiation.39 Another’s fear While fear could cause a counterpart to accept a deal favorable to you in order to resolve the matter quickly, because fear makes people pessimistic and can paralyze them, it is a threat to most deals no matter which party is fearful. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:20 am by Theo Francis
Image source: C J Sorg via Flickr ——— Michelle taped a segment for Yahoo! [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Suppressing those emotions can impair a negotiator’s ability to recall details of,4 or reason about5, the matter in dispute. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Whether the lawyers should have gone public with their concerns, blowing the whistle on their client, remains a matter of debate. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
  For instance, if the payor spouse is required by his employer to contribute $30,000 per year towards his 401(k), should such money be included in that spouse's income in determining support? [read post]