Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 281 - 300 of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:37 am
The table below, culled from the 10-K, summarizes the adjustments made by category. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The OD did not admit the late-filed ground for opposition pursuant to A 100(b) into the proceedings since it could not see “any prima facie relevance in the late filed submissions concerning the ground of opposition under A 100(b)”. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the first auxiliary request is entitled to the priority of document D0 (A 87(1)(b)). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It rather reflects the applicant’s substantive right under A 76 to file a divisional application on an earlier application if the subject matter of the earlier application is “still present” at the time the divisional application is filed (see G 1/05 [11.2]). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:16 am by Stephen Lubben
Because they fall into the same bizarreness that the District court did:We are asked here not to determine whether the “indubitable equivalent” would necessarily be satisfied by the sale; rather, we are asked to interpret the requirements of § 1129(b)(2)(A) as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In steps B to E each the following mental activities are performed based on the application of mathematical methods: (i) forming a data set (step B ), (ii) establishing a distribution set of probability distributions (step C ), (iii) applying the first reaction value to each pertinent probability distribution (step D) and (iv) determining the genotype based on the data obtained from step D (step E). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, the appellant’s statement of grounds of appeal did not include any argument regarding the obviousness of the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Of relevance to the present matter, the Act provides that reimbursement for medical marijuana costs is not required of “a government medical assistance program or private health insurer. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The opponent objected to this amendment on the ground that it violated A 123(3).The Board would not accept this argument:[3.3] The amendments amount to a limitation of the definition of the monomer of each of steps a) and b) recited in the set of granted claims, i.e. divinylbenzene and N-methyl-N-vinylacetamide, respectively, thus leading to a limitation of the scope of the subject-matter claimed. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
The Florida securities lawyers at McCabe Rabin, P.A. represent investors nationwide in FINRA arbitration matters. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
It does not however imply that the processes a) and b) are necessarily separated in space and time. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:09 pm by Adam Levitin
It quotes Larry Platt, a bank-industry lawyer at K&L Gates (which lost Ibanez). [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The beta-casein A2, A3, D and E variants contain a proline at position 67 whereas in the beta-casein variants A1, B, C and F proline-67 is substituted by a histidine (see page 13, lines 24 to 27). [read post]