Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 281 - 300 of 3,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
The Issues The Court was tasked with deciding whether:(1) The SPC application complied with Article 3(b)(2) The absence of a MA was an irregularity that could be cured under Article 10(3)Arnold J sided with the Comptroller'sreasoningDid the SPC application comply with Article 3(b)? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
 The second is Mr Justice Arnold, whose detailed and inevitably lengthy pronouncements on matters of IP law have truly earned the adjective 'Arnoldian' a permanent place in our working vocabulary. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
 Juror C then announced that `no matter what happens, my verdict is for guilty. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm by Jessica Kroeze
The decision was taken having regard to the following documentary evidence amongst others:D2: JP 2008-101051 AD2b: certified translation in English of D2D3: DE 10 2005 047 807 A1D5: Paint and Coating Testing Manual, Fourteenth Edition of the Gardner-Sward Handbook, J. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
I thought I’d pass along this very interesting article by Judge Andrew J. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The Opposition Division held that none of the grounds of opposition raised and substantiated under Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty, lack of inventive step, and under Article 100(b) EPC (lack of sufficient disclosure) held against the patent. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The firm: They don’t have the externalities problem b/c they internalize benefits of buying. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:11 am by Ray Dowd
   Such preparation may include registering competing copyright claims for the same subject matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 McGeveran: Coordination isn’t a matter of mere tidiness; need an independent reason to police the boundary. [read post]