Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 281 - 300
of 119,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 5:15 pm
We are discussing Wood v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
' by looking into Capitol Records v Vimeo and Viacom v YouTube. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:26 pm
Clear and convincing evidence may include declaration testimony. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Further to the list of Guantánamo inmates linked by Nicki below, there may well be a change in one the listed cases fairly soon, due to two recent decisions by English courts: R (Hicks) v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
On March 5, 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to constitute an en banc panel to reconsider a decision issued by the court in Trek Leather Inc. et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:33 am
US v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
Evidence lawfully obtained may be used to initiate an investigation of an employee even if similar information was received in violation of lawMatter of Lomax v Kelly, 2011 NY Slip Op 01894, Appellate Division, First DepartmentRichard Lomax, a New York City probationary police officer, was off-duty with a fellow officer when the vehicle he was driving skidded on ice and rear-ended another car. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
The Procopio v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:23 pm
People v Weaver, 2009 NY Slip Op 03762, Decided on May 12, 2009, Court of Appeals A number disciplinary actions taken against employees were initiated by, or relied upon, the use of global positioning equipment installed in the employer's vehicle... [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:05 am
In Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:05 pm
You may remember [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:15 am
In KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:17 am
Regina v Y (A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762; [2010] WLR (D) 112 “Where a person possessed information likely to be useful to a terrorist within the meaning of s 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000, the fact that the possession was for the purpose of lawful self-defence which was solely defensive was capable of amounting to the statutory defence of reasonable excuse under s 58(3) of the 2000 Act, to an offence of possession under s 58(1). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
It may very well represent the most significant e-discovery case in the nation at this moment, and US v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:14 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Coats v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
May's sentence? [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
April 22, 2021 Kenney, J.), the court upheld a regular use exclusion and, in the process, rejected the Plaintiff’s arguments under Gallagher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 7:38 pm
The US Supreme Court Tuesday heard oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Lawson v. [read post]
