Search for: "MILLENNIUM TITLE " Results 281 - 300 of 435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2012, 11:53 am by Blaine T. Bettinger
For the fifth time, the Librarian of Congress (currently James Hadley Billington), upon the recommendation of the Register of Copyrights (currently Maria Pallante,), will conduct a rulemaking proceeding to determine whether certain prohibitions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) adversely affect users of copyrighted works. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:01 am
  As was observed by a commenter on Bill Marler's blog post titled Marler Clark to Cargill: Start Testing and We Won't Sue You: And after three strikes -- "After all, this outbreak marks the fourth antibiotic-resistant Salmonella outbreak for the company since 2002,” added Marler" --Cargill isn't out -- and now there's an offer of a wrist-slap for the 4th major contamination outbreak?? [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:19 pm by Craig J. Cox
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) already allows copyright holders to get the hosting company to take down infringing material from a website. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Notably absent is a similar provision relating to trademark law (Title 15 of the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Copyright was expressly described as property in several of the State copyright acts that predated the US Constitution.8 The Supreme Court has classified and referred to copyright as property throughout its history — in 1823, for example, the Court stated, “The protection of property should extend as well to one subject as to another: to that which results from improvements, made under the faith of titles emanating from the government, as to a proprietary… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:34 pm by Daniel Richardson
  This issue derives from the ever-expanding concept of “marital property,” which doesn’t always require good, present title anymore. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 2:06 pm by Derek Bambauer
It is: "primarily designed or operated for the purpose of, has only limited purpose or use other than, or is marketed by its operator or another acting in concert with that operator for use in, offering goods or services in a manner that engages in, enables, or facilitates" violations of the Copyright Act, Title I of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or anti-counterfeiting laws; or, "is taking, or has taken, deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high… [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm by Derek Bambauer
It is: “primarily designed or operated for the purpose of, has only limited purpose or use other than, or is marketed by its operator or another acting in concert with that operator for use in, offering goods or services in a manner that engages in, enables, or facilitates” violations of the Copyright Act, Title I of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or anti-counterfeiting laws; or, “is taking, or has taken, deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:50 am by structuredsettlements
Please click on the title for the full content, If you find yourself on FAEMM community, back out and type in www. structuredsettlements.typepad.com [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 pm by Daniel Richardson
So it is in today’s case that we have enough issues to keep Sophocles occupied for another millennium, playing out as backdrop and window dressing to the legal issues in the forefront. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm by Derek Bambauer
The question is, formally, one of interpreting Title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. 512), and determining whether YouTube meets the statutory requirements for immunity from liability. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm by Derek Bambauer
The question is, formally, one of interpreting Title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. 512), and determining whether YouTube meets the statutory requirements for immunity from liability. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:03 pm by Jay McDaniel
Millennium Radio Group LLC, No. 10-2163 (3d Cir. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
  Venue: the Millennium Hotel London Knightsbridge. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The title is Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights, and Policy. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:29 am by Jon Sheldon
 Access is free as long as you keep the title current. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
" The Consulate General of Mexico, meanwhile, claimed that the object was unlawfully exported from that country.CBP seized the four inch tall Nayarit figurine under Title 19, Chapter 14 of the customs laws. [read post]