Search for: "Maintenance Dept." Results 281 - 300 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 4:56 am by John Hochfelder
New York City Transit Authority  (1st Dept. 2019), the pain and suffering award was found to be excessive and it was reduced to $1,675,000 ($1,000,000 past, $675,000 future); the other damages awards were affirmed. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to any negligence on the part of defendants (see Hotaling v City of New York, 55 AD3d 396, 398 [1st Dept 2008], affd 12 NY3d 862 [2009]). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 5:06 am by John Hochfelder
C&L Contracting Corp. (1st Dept. 2013), determined that the pain and suffering damages should be increased by $840,000. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 2:55 am by John Hochfelder
The only defendant remaining at trial was Advanced Fleet Maintenance, Inc. which serviced the truck’s transmission six months before the accident (and had been brought into the case by Crown as a third-party defendant). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:56 am by Patricia Salkin
  White Plains Rural Cemetery Association v City of White Plains, 2019 WL 362123 (NYAD 2 Dept. 1/30/2019). [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 1:14 pm by John Hochfelder
The mat had been placed by hospital maintenance personnel a month earlier after a flood damaged the floor and some ceramic tiles were removed. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:30 pm by Edward Smith
In the case of Lewis v State Dept of Transportation (1995) a vehicle collided with a falling tree. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:21 am by John Hochfelder
Vasquez (1st Dept. 2016), the appellate court reversed and confirmed the award because (a) it was “rationally supported by the record” and (b) there was sufficient evidence that claimant’s injuries had resolved. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 5:51 pm
Dept. of Labor, Dept. of Labor Statisics, Work at Home in 2004 (2005) [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Hendrix, 93 A.D.2d 788, 461 N.Y.S.2d 823 (1st Dept. 1983); but see, Williams v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:56 am by Stephen Bilkis
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the “reasonable efforts” requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision (c) action… [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
However, we remand with instructions to the trial court to vacate Wife's award of rehabilitative maintenance and to provide incapacity maintenance. [read post]