Search for: "Major v. Social Security Administration" Results 281 - 300 of 1,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
EPA Administrator Michael S. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court’s conservative majority seemed sympathetic to Sen. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
The site is not secured from vehicles and the hose pump is also unsecured. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The majority held that an order permitting a home visit by social workers requires pretty much the same sort of showing of probable cause that's needed for searches of homes for evidence of crime. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
“Religious activities should be carried out within the scope stipulated by laws and regulations … and should not interfere with educational, judicial and administrative affairs as well as social life,” Xi said. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Courtroom Speech Evolves to Reflect Societal Change Courtroom rules about speech have always responded to changes in our legal system and our broader social context. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
Tarah Wheeler is an information security executive, social scientist in the area of international conflict, author, and poker player. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]