Search for: "Maker v. Maker"
Results 281 - 300
of 7,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm
[Jack Daniel's prevails against dog toy maker.] [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
T.I. and Tiny alleged misappropriation by the doll maker of the group’s name and likeness, trade dress infringement, and unfair competition, seeking economic damages and an order blocking further sale of the dolls. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:38 pm
However, the court rejected Mylan’s attempt to dismiss claims that it misrepresented the “risk of errors” in its Medicaid rebate calculations while at the time of those statements it was allegedly manipulating EpiPen’s rebate eligibility (MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
'Breakthrough' NSA spyware shows deep grasp of makers' hard drives http://t.co/sGCciotdYH -> How Google determined our right to be forgotten – an important read http://t.co/vuY4NTlUML -> A Circuit Split or Just a Surface-Blemish: Why Kienitz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
Last year's Supreme Court ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:59 am
Based on the EC's interpretation of Huawei v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:18 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:23 pm
In this FTC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:28 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:56 am
Skretny in his 25-page decision this month granting defendants' motion to dismiss in ONY, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:07 pm
In Brydon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:21 am
From IP Law360:MGA Entertainment, makers of the popular Bratz dolls, will hand over $13.2 million to video game company Ubisoft Entertainment, after an arbitrator ruled that Ubisoft had not violated theBratz trademark but MGA had violated a contract between the two companies.Ubisoft had obtained a license from MGA for the right to make video games based on the Bratz franchise in the spring of 2002.But in 2003, MGA purported to terminate the license under the claim that Ubisoft had failed to… [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 3:48 pm
See Cabral v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:03 pm
Under the more modern approach, as articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Tataryn v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm
The theory of liability in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
In addition to those ten Nokia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:11 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:53 am
Miller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Lyndon, 2023 WI 46 (6/6/2023) [read post]
