Search for: "Marine Holdings, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Cassie Preston
Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., et al. (4th Cir. 2014); Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:02 am by Editor
American Marine Holdings, Inc., a boat builder made subtle changes to the sheer line of an unprotected design then registered the new design for protection under the VHDPA. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Last week, after more than a year of drafting following oral argument, and nearly two years after the original District Court order, a Third Circuit panel (Chief Judge Scirica and Judges Fisher and Greenberg) issued their magnum opus on pleading Section 1 antitrust violations after Twombly and RICO Act "enterprises" after Boyle in the consolidated Multi-District Litigation In re: Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am by Glen C. Hansen
” The court described that “rulemaking process” and the “substantial evidence” in support of NMFS’ decision as follows: NMFS established a Biological Review Team of eight marine mammal biologists, a fishery biologist, a marine chemist, and a climate scientist to review the status of the “best scientific and commercial data available” regarding bearded seals. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm by Whitney Roy
CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS ORDINANCE REGULATING MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES NOT SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REVIEW Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:03 pm by WIMS
Coast Guard is undertaking a comprehensive marine casualty investigation regarding the recent grounding of the drill rig Kulluk. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 11:09 am
 In so holding, the Fourth Department declined to follow the holding on similar facts of the First Department in a 2010 case:We recognize that the First Department held otherwise on similar facts in Cirone v Tower Ins. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:42 pm
The plaintiff opposed the motion, relying upon the California Supreme Court's ruling in Covenant Care, Inc. v. [read post]