Search for: "Marine v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 1:59 pm
Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 534 (1999) (though Appellate Government erroneously cited that decision as United States v. [read post]
Law of Adjacent State Does Not Apply Under OCSLA Where Federal Maritime Law Applies of its Own Force
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Hamm v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:17 pm
I'll look at the numbers over the weekend to try to get a good handle on what has happened thus far this term.In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm
Meanwhile, the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals has released Judge Modzelewski’s opinion for the court in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Making a U-Turn Back to State CourtIn the case of Blizman v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 3:45 pm
The focus is on historical aspects (Part I), implementation of the UNCLOS (Part II), navigation (Part III), mid-ocean archipelagos (Part IV), the marine environment (Part V), and dispute settlement (Part VI). [read post]
31 May 2008, 2:45 pm
" When such individuals die before the CCA renders its opinion in the case, see generally United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:14 am
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 10:10 am
Marin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Fox v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm
Martin apparently signed by a Marine Corps colonel acting in his official capacity. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The first one was Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:41 am
Abbott Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Buffalo Marine Services, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:18 am
Congress explicitly stated that its objective in passing 35 U.S.C. [read post]
