Search for: "Mark Connot" Results 281 - 300 of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 3:22 am
Electronic, Serial No. 79191002 (June 25, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas).The Marks Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be identical in sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
The Board concluded that the marks are similar in appearance, pronunciation, connotation, and overall commercial impression due to the common term GUARDIAN.The Goods: The Board observed that it is not necessary for all the goods in the application and cited registration to be related in order to support a likelihood of confusion finding. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:21 am
Applicant Whatley contended that the marks are distinguishable because the "word 'winery' brings to mind vineyards, tasting rooms and wine barrels” while "the word 'wine' connotes the alcohol beverage itself." [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:36 am
"As to connotation, Petitioner argued that to the vast majority of Americans, the marks would have no meaning “other than as a trademark with a Spanish-language overtone” and “will leave identical commercial impressions. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:53 am by John L. Welch
There are no restrictions in the application, and the goods include everyday items purchased on impulse.As to the marks, the Board not surprisingly found them to be similar in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 3:49 am
The marks have "markedly different connotations and commercial impressions. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:06 am
The USPTO refused to register the marks REDNECK RIVIERA and REDNECK RIVIERA FEST for entertainment services and hotel and restaurant services [FEST disclaimed] on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically descriptive of the services under Section 2(e)(2). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
" As Applicant contends: "Here, the Applicant's CAT & CO. connotes a faux company name suggesting the goods are produced by a firm where the principal is a cat, which on its face is fancifully absurd. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
" The Board had affirmed the USTPO's refusal to register the mark absent a disclaimer of EMPORIUM. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:07 am
"In the context of restaurants selling California burgers, the mark as a whole will immediately be perceived as an abbreviation for a 'California burger,' and will not impart the connotation of a 'California lifestyle.'"Moreover, the evidence showed that applicant does indeed feature California burgers at its restaurants. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 3:36 am
And it found the marks to be highly similar in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
  While the court had acknowledged that Lindt did not use the word sign GOLDBÄREN , it held that the sight of the shape of Lindt's three-dimensional chocolate bears inevitably produced connotations with Haribo's bears, which could result in a dilution of Haribo's trade mark rights. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:19 am by John L. Welch
It agreed with the Applicant that the mark is an "oxymoronic connotation" that raises it above the merely descriptive. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
(p. 8).We now consider the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:01 am by John L. Welch
Moreover, the connotations of the two marks are different:We find the commercial impression of opposer’s mark in the slightly stylized “CREATING YOUR FUTURE” to be one of inviting participant’s to invent their own path in self improvement. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:13 am
”The Board found that the marks are similar in meaning and connotation, and concluded that the first DuPont factor supported the Section 2(d) refusal.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant DuPont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it therefore affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: What about that accent mark on applicant's specimen of use? [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
In short, the marks are similar in sound, appearance, and meaning (with CHAMPION connoting the best or superior services). [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:32 am
The marks convey the same connotation and commercial impression of a beverage that is "different from the others, i.e., that it has been 'redefined.'" Consumers are likely to view the marks as indicating a single source, with the generic portions of the marks simply identifying the particular type of beverage. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:44 am by John L. Welch
In comparison, the first terms in opposer’s pleaded marks are MUSCLE and MIGHTY which do not convey anything about nutrients or nutrition.In view thereof, we find that when wording with completely different connotations is added before LECHE and MILK, i.e., NUTRI on the one hand and MUSCLE and MIGHTY on the other, the ensuing combination of the terms create marks with completely different connotations.Finally, the commercial impressions of the marks are… [read post]