Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 10:10 am
But Congress is spending my money to buy votes of people who don't represent me for their bill that I don't support.Yeah, the heartland of immoral. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
(The video of the hearing is available on the committee’s hearing page; skip ahead to about the 68:40 mark.) [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
I On that issue, the government’s argument is a shell game. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 4:08 am
[I]t would make no sense whatsoever for Congress to have insisted, in relation to § 1114 for example, that one who ‘without the consent of the registrant . . . use[d]. . . [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:02 am
According to an explainer, these models are customized for Congress and each state legislature, as well as for each legislative chamber. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:00 am
Then, little more than a month later here in California (where I teach), Assemblyman Mark Stone introduced a bill to revise the California Taxpayers Access To Publicly Funded Research Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:17 pm
I think I will call it the Congress McGongress. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:56 pm
(When obscure parts of the Fourteenth Amendment are under discussion, Mark Graber and I are on the case.) [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 6:21 am
As I've discussed before, as a condition of being able to speak to their client in the first place, the government required the lawyers to agree not to reveal what their client has told them -- not even to members of Congress! [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:15 pm
Section 3(i), p. 14. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
(Sasha Volokh) I agree with Jonathan below that the Constitution (through the spending power) allows Congress to spend tax money to protect the Earth from an asteroid.On the other hand — and at the risk of confirming Mark Kleiman in his belief that libertarians are loopy — I don’t speak for all libertarians, but I think there’s a good case to be made that taxing people to protect the Earth from an asteroid, while within… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:33 am
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap I UPC - update from UK on statutory instruments I The ILO rules reinstatement of Board of Appeal member, but EPO resists I INTA calling: The 2018 Ladas Memorial Award competition for paper on a trademark subject I R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heard I Germany: Bundespatentgericht annuls Nespresso capsule shape mark I Wind in the sails for atypical trade… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm
Louis Stokes (D-Ohio) of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey last week notified Congress that he is lobbying on behalf of Cleveland State University, marking the second time in July that the lobbyist filed paperwork to disclose a new client. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:37 am
It also marks the shift of focus from OpenAIR to the Global Congress per se.The day began with, among other things, a summary of activist activities in Canada against oppressive copyright legislation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:55 am
"I am so shamed to have hurt those I love. [read post]
10 May 2007, 7:29 am
I've mentioned the three-year-rule before, but we're now past the four-year mark (five if you count Afghanistan). [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 5:48 am
It marked a departure of a more “top down” and regulatory approach that was considered and ultimately voted down on Capitol Hill during the 112th Congress. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:35 pm
I am sending the Congress a budget that rebuilds the military, eliminates the Defense sequester, and calls for one of the largest increases in national defense spending in American history. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:43 am
Teehankee of De La Salle University and Mark R. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
To mark 230 years since that occasion, I’m posting the text of a brief talk I gave during the Center for Protection of Intellectual Property’s fourth annual fall conference October 2016 (video of the talk available here). [read post]
