Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
June 17, 2014) (certification); Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
Smith [Continued yesterday in Part 1.] [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) out of the jurisprudence, confining Locke v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
” Esperanza Andrade, Secretary of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:41 am
Bostic (Virginia); and Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Smith, Jr., Lane v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
To get a sense as to how the Justices might rule in Janus v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am
Global Traffic Technologies, No. 15-592 (Whether marking the packaging of a patented article with patent notification satisfies the marking provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
