Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 281 - 300
of 34,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Case is C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v Kosan Gas A/S, formerly BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling under from the Danish Højesteret [the IPKat interjects to add that, since the Danes are so good at speaking other languages, it is easy to forget that they speak Danish too: Højesteret is the Danish for 'Supreme Court' and is not, as Merpel mischievously tells people, a tasty dessert]. [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
See Express Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:02 pm
Judge Robinson stated in Brinkmeier v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:27 am
by Dennis Crouch VersaTop v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
SC07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where… [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:10 pm
The Federal Court recently issued its judgment in NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
" Hollander v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
" Hollander v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
Trade mark dilution - changes and lessonsThe Intellectual Property Institute is holding a seminar on Thursday 18 January 2007 on the subject "Trade mark dilution: Changes in the US - Lessons for Europe? [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:34 am
" Josephs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:49 am
Case: Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 94Being a busy solo, I've not had a lot of time to wallow around in cases as much as I'd like. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:25 am
See, e.g., Instructure, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm
In its judgment Hasco TM v EUIPO - Esi (NATURCAPS), the General Court dealt with the question whether such regulatory definitions play a role in interpreting the meaning of a term in the list of goods and services. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:28 am
" Virgin Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The Board cited Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:04 pm
At least one false marking plaintiff is following the lead of the most prolific false marking plaintiff, Thomas Simonian, by borrowing, word for word, the additional paragraph Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
